Jury Rejects Workplace Harassment and Retaliation Suit
The case, which had been reinstated by the California Supreme Court in 2024, concluded with a jury verdict on Tuesday.
Updated on Oct. 23, 2026 in Human Resources
Live Poll
Should courts have the final say in determining what constitutes workplace harassment?
A San Francisco Superior Court jury has cleared a workplace harassment and retaliation lawsuit brought by a long-term investigative assistant. The verdict follows a two-week trial regarding an alleged 2015 incident.
Why it matters
The case highlights the legal standard for workplace discrimination after the California Supreme Court ruled last year that a single incident can be sufficient for such litigation. While this jury rejected the claims, the plaintiff's attorney has indicated there may be grounds for an appeal.
A jury voted 10-2 to reject a harassment claim and 12-0 to reject a retaliation claim after two hours of deliberation. The trial, which lasted two weeks, followed a 2024 California Supreme Court decision that reinstated the case.
The players
Twanda Bailey
An investigative assistant who sued for harassment and retaliation.
California Supreme Court
The state's highest judicial body that reinstated the case in 2024.
The details
Twanda Bailey, who has served as an investigative assistant since 2001, alleged that a co-worker used a racial slur against her in January 2015. The co-worker denied the allegation during the proceedings. The jury rendered its verdict on October 22, 2026, following the California Supreme Court's July 2024 ruling that allowed the case to proceed.
Timeline
Twanda Bailey was hired as an investigative assistant in 2001.
The alleged incident occurred in January 2015.
The California Supreme Court reinstated the case in July 2024.
A jury rejected the lawsuit on October 22, 2026.
Across the Bay
This verdict marks the first significant local application of the California Supreme Court's July 2024 precedent. The ruling previously established that a single incident could provide sufficient grounds for a workplace harassment lawsuit.
The jury's decision concludes the current trial proceedings in San Francisco. Residents involved in ongoing workplace disputes should note that while the court allowed the case to reach a jury, the plaintiff's lawyer has indicated a potential for appeal.
The takeaway
This case confirms that while the 2024 state Supreme Court ruling makes it easier for single-incident cases to reach trial, the burden of proof at trial remains unchanged. Monitor local court dockets for any future filings regarding a potential appeal.
Further reading
For more on local employment law and workplace standards, see Human Resources.
Source note: This article includes information reported by San Francisco Chronicle.
Live Poll
Should courts have the final say in determining what constitutes workplace harassment?
